This
is the "shade tree"
conversion that started it
all for the author |
The
beginnings of the Bacon Manufacturing Co., and the resultant lawsuit
brought by the Manhattan Firearms Manufacturing Co. has been well documented
in Waldo E. Nutter’s 1958
book,
Manhattan Firearms.
However, a brief history
might be in order here.
Sometime between 1848 and 1850, Thomas K. Bacon, who
had moved there from Massachusetts with Ethan Allen, set up shop as a pistol
maker in Norwich, Connecticut, calling his small company Bacon & Co.,
and producing a selection of single shot pistols and an interesting
underhammer six shot pepperbox. Norwich, being on the eastern seaboard and
easily accessible by railroad was an ideal location for light industry, and
attracted many firearms manufacturers.
Bacon, it would
seem, was not as great a businessman as he was pistol designer and his company
faced serious financial difficulties within a few short years. In 1857 the
opportunity presented itself for Bacon to take the appointment of general
superintendent of the newly formed Manhattan Firearms Manufacturing Co.
whose first factory was also situate in Norwich. Manhattan Firearms had been
formed by a group of investors with little to no firearms making experience,
and Thomas Bacon was available and clearly willing to lend that essential
element. There is evidence that an agreement existed whereby he could also
provide certain items (“cones and barrels”) to Manhattan as an inside
contractor.
Evidently Bacon had
it in mind to resume pistol manufacturing in his own right and so, in 1858, he
quit Manhattan Firearms and established the Bacon Manufacturing Company. The
lawsuit followed whereby Manhattan sued Bacon under the terms of a “no
compete” agreement, but this action never reached a conclusion in the
courts, and Bacon’s new company was able to continue production.
I first became
interested in the guns of the Bacon Manufacturing Co. a few years ago when I
was given a cut-down and converted second model percussion revolver by Randy
Schmelig, a dear friend and the minister of the church I attended in Florida.
Upon discovering the faint markings on the top of the barrel, I just had to
find out more, and so began my quest for knowledge and further examples of
this maker’s guns. I have achieved a small amount of success in both
ventures and am taking the opportunity to share some of them with the readers
of this edition of The Texas Gun Collector.
|
|
|
Excelsior s/n 178 in
English made case with non-original accoutrements
|
The first firearm
marketed by the new company was ‘Bacon’s Excelsior Model,’ as it was
advertised. This was a .31 caliber, five-shot, ‘powder and ball,’ pocket
revolver with an octagonal barrel (4” and 5”) and a straight sided
cylinder, and which very closely resembled the pocket revolver being
manufactured by Manhattan Firearms. The differences between the two were
fairly minor - Bacon’s five cylinder stop slots vs. Manhattan’s ten, and
in the detail of the loading lever catch.
 |
|
.31
Calibre percussion pocket revolvers - first through third
variations. Note cylinder and barrel differences |
The Excelsior was
followed by the Second Model which sported the same frame and grips as the
former, but had a round barrel (4”, 5” and 6”) and a semi-fluted
cylinder. The Third Model eventually appeared combining some elements of each
of the first two - round barrel (4”, 5” and 6”) and the straight-sided
cylinder. I believe that all Excelsiors and most second and third models had
simple rose vine scroll engraving on the frame, some second and third models
being manufactured with plain frames. A few presentation models were treated
to more elaborate engraving on the frame and a small amount on the barrel.
With the advent of metallic cartridges many firearms makers, Bacon included,
developed an amazing variety of revolvers to load them, sometimes seeking ways
to avoid or evade the Rollin White patent of 1855 assigned to Smith & Wesson.
Revolvers produced by the
|
Bacon Manufacturing Co. were a six-shot pocket revolver
chambered for .32 rimfire (4” and 5” octagonal barrels), with a small
framed seven-shot variation chambered for both .22 and .25
rimfire, each with a 2½” octagonal barrel.
 |
|
. |
.32RF Cal. Pocket Revolvers:
At top: 5-inch .32RF Short
At bottom: 4-inch .32RF Long |
An unusual design of the
Bacon Manufacturing Co. in the early 1860’s was that of a revolver requiring
the trigger guard to be unscrewed before the cylinder could be removed for reloading. This model came
with two slightly differing frame/cylinder sizes to accommodate .32 rimfire
short and long. This gun is one of the rarer models available today,
production being swiftly curtailed by legal action by Smith & Wesson.
Bacon preceded
S&W with a swing out cylinder by some 34 years having been assigned
Charles W. Hopkins’ 1862 patent. The cylinder, chambered for .32 rimfire,
swung out to the right of the frame to a degree sufficient to allow the
loading of one round at a time. These guns were made with 4” and 6”
octagonal barrels. A small frame version chambered for .22 rimfire cartridges
was also manufactured.

The display above shows at least one example each of most of the guns
discussed in this article in the center portion of the board (i.e. all but
the four at top left and the five at top right)
Perhaps the most
desirable of the revolvers made by the Bacon Manufacturing Co. are the three
(or is it four) variations of the so-called “American Navy Pistol.” This
large framed cartridge revolver with spur trigger was made with a 7½”
octagonal barrel, its cylinder chambered for six .38 rimfire caliber
cartridges. Bacon Manufacturing was optimistic that the US Navy would place a
contract for this pistol, but was passed over, apparently because the
government had concluded that the company would not have been able to produce
the guns in the quantities required. The Navy model was initially made with
the unusual feature of a screw-off, knurled disc at the rear of the cylinder
which had to be removed to enable reloading after removal of the cylinder from
the frame. A later variation of this revolver dispensed with the disk in favor
of a more well defined recoil shield. The third variation features the same
swing out cylinder resulting from C.W. Hopkins’ patent as was found in the
smaller framed .32 caliber revolver discussed above. A few examples of a
fourth, and very rare, variation are known to exist. This gun is distinguished
from the earlier models by the button style cylinder pin reminiscent of the
.32 rimfire pocket revolver.
Even in the days of
the repeating revolver there was a demand for single-shot pistols, and the
Bacon Manufacturing Co. was able to help meet the challenge.
 |
.32
Single Shot - Large Frame (high standing recoil
shield) |
|
.32
Single Shot - Small Frame
(flush breech) |
 |
Two distinct
models were made, the large frame type (high standing recoil shield) and the
small frame type (flush recoil shield). Both had the swing barrel
breech-loading feature and both were chambered for the .32 rimfire cartridge.
These pistols had octagonal barrels (4” and 5”) and the small frame type
will also be found with 6” barrels as well. A brass-framed variation of the
small frame type was also made.
In 1863 Thomas K.
Bacon was ousted from his position with the second company he founded, the
Bacon Manufacturing Co. However, it remained in business until 1868 when the
assets were sold to several of the major shareholders who proceeded to form
the Hopkins & Allen Manufacturing Co. Bacon formed the Bacon
Arms Co. which stayed in business until 1888, although Thomas himself
departed at the end of 1865.
The three companies
founded by Thomas K. Bacon of Norwich, Connecticut produced many different
types of handguns (and one shotgun) - more than I could hope to cover in a
brief article of this nature, and very many more than I can ever hope to
collect. In this brief article I have concentrated on the products of the
second of these manufacturing firms, it having produced the largest variety.
Although I have not covered all models nor all variations brought about by
engraving (or lack thereof), by barrel markings or of original finish, I trust
that I have indeed given the reader a slight taste of Bacon.
©2000,
2002 Richard Overall
|